Monday, January 23, 2012

Kodak's Self-Destruction, an Inside Story

I worked for Kodak for four years, but it wasn't by choice.

Kodak purchased a Vancouver company named Creo, as part of their vision to convert Kodak to a digital company before the roof caved in from falling film revenue. The strategy was sound. The execution - a disaster. There are three kinds of mistakes we saw as Creo-ites, mistakes that were an anthema to the values that the founders of Creo sought to avoid, and did so successfully, for the years that led to Creo's phenomenal growth and eventual move to a public company. While speculation runs amok in the popular press about Kodak’s demise, I can tell you what it looked like from the inside.

Kodak executives were not naive about the future of digital cameras, and indeed Kodak was in the best market position to bring out the “brownie” of digital cameras - the one that would have made Kodak the household name in point-and-shoot digital. What was lacking was not vision, but courage. Kodak management just could not bring themselves to take a terrific new camera to market, even though Kodak had the Brownie, Instamatic, and Starmite lines in their DNA. In the end they just could not muster the courage to actively end the reign of film themselves. The camera is dead - long live the camera! should have been the battle cry, but no executive vice-president was prepared to be the person perceived to be the reason for the demise of the film cash-cow. Instead, they handed it to Fuji to decimate the Kodak film business, instead of doing it themselves, and losing the market share of film and future digital cameras to their major competitor.

The second thing we learned about how badly things were in Kodak was the exposure to the incredibly large, self-perpetuating bureaucracy that took us from 4 layers between the CEO and staff to about 12. Executive VPs, VPs, executive assistants reflected the 1950’s model of a happy Kodak family living off 90% gross-margin film and loved by America. We watched competent professionals, who made rational arguments and economic decisions, replaced by Kodak company-bots who made a career out of squeezing the innovation out of one division, showing an increased profitability, then moving onto another group before the other collapsed. The kind of pyramid promotion scheme we had only seen in movies was being played out every day, and the shell-game players rewarded each other with promotions and bonuses. A very abrupt insight into American corporate politics, and a foreshadow of the inevitable time when the music stops and the carefully-planned moves of the survivors ensure their bonuses were safe.

Finally, the last element that destroyed Kodak is that they lost sight of who they are. Antonio tried to remake the company into a digital imaging force in the market, to prove that his ouster from HP was a mistake, but HP executed on the digital imaging strategy far more easily, with their purchase of Indigo, and their active self-cannibalization of the LaserJet by transferring energy to the DeskJet line, in a move that preserved their overall consumables strategy. Kodak was not a digital imaging company any more than it was a film imaging company. By losing sight of who they were, Kodak let the 1984 Olympics torch pass to Fuji, starting Fuji's American ascent at Kodak's expense. Kodak’s retired CMO Carl Gustin I think understood this: Kodak was the memories company. Kodak moments were the true American spirit behind the yellow boxes, not the chemically-treated plastic inside them. Kodak glimpsed that vision with the Gallery - at least the Kodak Gallery that could have been. Once again there was no lack of vision for Gallery, from the digital generation of marketing folk. One could imagine the thousands of images uploaded every minute worldwide, correlated by time and location for shared current events, like a tsunami or a rally; by location over time to build a retrospective of a famous landmark through the years. Instead, while YouTube recklessly let people upload anything without limit, the Gallery threatened users that their precious images would be deleted (deleted from their shoebox!) if they didn't buy stuff. The Kodak Gallery could have been the Story of America, shared, over time, instead of lost in shoe-boxes in the attics of the previous generation.

In the end, being stuck in the previous generation is what did Kodak in. Kodak dies an old man, friendless, having squandered his children’s inheritance on dreams of past glory, instead of investing in that same next generation, and treating digital as a tremendous new opportunity instead of an old threat to be managed.

RIP Kodak, and thanks for the company that invented continuous film, the Brownie camera, the Instamatic, and motion picture film that captured nuance and shadow to tell great stories.

4 comments:

Scoughman said...

Your blog needs better leading. And you could stand to drop the font size by a couple of points.

But yeah, good stuff.

Thomas Clifford said...

GREAT Comment and so true. As A Rochester boy I know this all too well. Kodak slide to chapter 11 started with Kay Whitmore back in the 80's He was run out on a rail as CEO because he knew they needed to move to digital... but the denial ran deep! I wish them the best and I hope they can pull out of this tail spin!

Jay said...

You also didn't have to look hard to see how stuck in the past they were. Even at an individual level, long-time Kodak employees' business cards often had portraits that were decades old!

Your comment about their vision and identity is bang on. It's one of the fundamental success factors Collins writes about in Built to Last (IIRC).

Dave Kauffman said...

More on this topic when I was interviewed by Canadian Business Magazine. http://www.canadianbusiness.com/article/71121--creo-the-digitization-printing-company-that-could-have-saved-kodak